We were thrilled to have a great guest post from Moin Rahman this week, with a very thought provoking piece on ethics in human factors. If you missed this, here is your chance. A great read from a great mind.
The three articles from our standard series got a ton of response on the EID site and on Linked In. We clearly hit a couple of major nerves. But for surprising reasons I think.
Many of our loyal readers (based on the fact that they read all of the articles in the sitting/standing/leaning series) had some strong opinions on these articles, including the one this week. One point that Brian Peacock shared was that any strategy that uses absolutes is going to be flawed. Can’t argue with that. But the article this week focused on emotion, which is something very different from the usual debate, so I was hoping for comments on that. Now, I am really looking forward to the response when the last piece of this series comes out (in two weeks) on kids and sitting. Articles about kids always brings out the best and worst in all of us. Stay tuned.
Which brings me to the free range parenting article. The idea here is that the free range children movement is gaining some momentum, but it hits the wall when parents get intimidated by their neighbors, community, and even the police about letting their kids range.
Then the final article (which actually appeared first on Monday) was a behavioral science piece on smarter lunchrooms. The San Francisco public school system and IDEO teamed up to create a very innovative lunchroom environment (not your everyday cafeteria). And it seems to work.
As always, I would love to hear your thoughts on any of these.