We have some very practical but future thinking ideas on
Ergonomics in Design this week. If you
think those are contradictory, please take a look at the articles.
For example, on Monday we talked about the electronic-only residency program that has been launched by Estonia. This is a reality, although at the cutting
edge of e-Gov inititiatives. Whether it
is really practical or not I guess depends in part on how many people sign up
and if they get some benefits from it.
But I have no doubt that what we learn from the exercise will lead e-Gov
development going forward.
Tuesday’s example may be the future, but probably not
exactly as suggested in the article (so it is still forward thinking). In a few different LinkedIn groups,
ergonomics, design, and optimization experts have weighed in on some challenges
with the design. But the approach seems to match what airlines are trying to
do, so I suspect something along these lines will be our reality.
I really liked the Wednesday post. In part because it goes against conventional wisdom and I love when that happens. But also because it suggests that aging might not be as bad for cognition as we previous thought and since I am getting old soon enough it gives me personal hope.
I really liked the Wednesday post. In part because it goes against conventional wisdom and I love when that happens. But also because it suggests that aging might not be as bad for cognition as we previous thought and since I am getting old soon enough it gives me personal hope.
And Thursday, I cited a report that found that the data
many people are basing their social media research on is flawed well beyond
what we appreciated. There are many
sources of bias that, when added together, might make all of our generalized
findings suspect. Back to the drawing
board. And since my personal expertise
is in designing research methods with internal and external validity, I am happy
to work with these social media companies to restructure their approaches.
No comments:
Post a Comment