“America is Too
Liberal to Elect Bernie Sanders”
When I saw this headline in the Boston Globe, I did a double
take. No, a triple take. Then I read the article and I realized I had
gotten sloppy. I have been careful to differentiate small c/big C conservative
and small d/big d democrat. But not as careful between small l/big L
liberal. And the difference is
critical.
In that light, the headline is actually spot on. And the article is a must read. Many thanks
to Jonathan Schlefer for clarifying some really important points.
If you are considering voting for Bernie it is a 100% must
read. If not, it is still 75%.
First, let’s take a trip back in history to the days of the
Founding Fathers (a favorite topic of mine as you know). When they borrowed John Locke’s idea of the
right to life, liberty and property (otherwise known as the pursuit of
happiness) they were talking about individual rights. The definition of small “l”
liberal harkens back to the idea that we are endowed by our creator with these
inalienable rights. As individuals. This
is how the idea of liberty is defined. A
liberal is someone who believes in individual liberty of this kind.
Let’s contrast this with a small “s” socialist who believes
that we should cede some of our individual liberties for the collective
good. Sound familiar, Bernie fans? This
is where national health care, tuition-free college, strong social safety net,
and so on are derived.
So to be a true “democratic socialist” as Bernie espouses,
he is not a liberal. He has to be
anti-liberal. He has to believe that liberals need to be induced to cede their individual
liberty for the common good. They need to pay taxes to support the health care,
tuition, etc. of others. They need to pay more for goods to support a higher
minimum wage, family leave, etc. of others.
You might think that this is a valuable ethical and moral
tradeoff. You might think it is progressive.
You might think it is democratic. You
might think it is the way of the future. You might think it is exactly the kind
of position you want in a President.
But it is not liberal. At least not the small “l” kind. America was founded on small “l” liberal
values and they still run strong in many voters. So Jonathan Schlefer at the
Boston Globe may be right that this creates a steep uphill climb for Bernie to
scale to win a general election where 100 million people will vote.
1 comment:
By the way, this is not just a matter of semantics. When we are selecting a president or any leader, we need to recognize the tradeoffs that his or her approach makes. In this case, it would be sacrificing some of our individual liberty for greater societal equality.
If you are happy with that tradeoff, go with Bernie. If not, think twice.
Post a Comment